Optimized Sales Optimized Marketing Target Accounts For CROs For CFOs For CMOs Blog Glossary Compare Tools About Schedule a Demo
Metrics & KPIs

Burn Multiple

ORM Technologies
Home/ Glossary/ Burn Multiple
Definition Net cash burned divided by net new ARR — a measure of how much you spend to generate each dollar of new recurring revenue, popularized by David Sacks.

Why Burn Multiple Replaced Growth Rate as the Efficiency Test

Growth rate tells you how fast you are going. Burn multiple tells you how much fuel you are wasting to get there. David Sacks at Craft Ventures popularized this metric because growth-at-all-costs masked fundamentally broken business models for years. A company growing 100% that burns $3 for every $1 of net new ARR is not impressive — it is a bonfire.

The formula is simple: net cash burned divided by net new ARR. It captures everything — not just sales and marketing, but R&D, G&A, and all the overhead that CAC conveniently ignores. That is what makes burn multiple more honest than CAC alone.

The Benchmarks That Matter

Where you sit on the burn multiple spectrum determines your board conversation. Below 1.0 is elite — you generate more than a dollar of net new ARR for every dollar burned. Between 1.0 and 1.5 is healthy. Above 2.0 signals compounding inefficiency (Craft Ventures, 2022).
StageTarget Burn MultipleWhat It Signals
Early ($1-5M ARR)1.5-2.0Acceptable while finding product-market fit
Growth ($10-50M ARR)0.5-1.0Engine is working, ready to scale
Scale ($50M+ ARR)Below 0.5Efficient growth machine
The range tightens as you scale. Investors give early-stage companies more room because they are still iterating on go-to-market. By the time you are raising a Series C, a burn multiple above 1.5 raises serious questions.

Where Teams Get the Calculation Wrong

The most common mistake is using gross new ARR instead of net new ARR. If you added $5M in new and expansion ARR but lost $2M to churn and contraction, your net new ARR is $3M — not $5M. Using the gross number flatters the ratio and hides retention problems.

The second mistake is excluding stock-based compensation from the burn calculation. If half your engineering team's comp is in equity, your cash burn looks artificially low. Sophisticated investors adjust for this.

How Burn Multiple Connects to Board Prep

Burn multiple is often the first metric investors ask about after ARR growth. It answers the question behind every other question: "Are you building a durable business, or are you buying revenue?" For finance teams preparing board decks, pair burn multiple with magic number and CAC payback to give a complete efficiency picture. Each metric tells a different part of the story — burn multiple is the one that captures all spending, not just go-to-market.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good burn multiple?

Below 1.0 is elite. Between 1.0 and 1.5 is healthy. Between 1.5 and 2.0 is acceptable for early-stage. Above 2.0 signals inefficiency that compounds over time (Craft Ventures, 2022).

How does burn multiple differ from CAC?

CAC measures cost per customer. Burn multiple measures total cash burned per dollar of net new ARR, capturing all company spending — not just sales and marketing. It is a more honest efficiency test.

What burn multiple should growth-stage companies target?

At the growth stage ($10-50M ARR), target 0.5 to 1.0. Burn multiple is often the first metric investors ask about after ARR growth during board prep.

Put these metrics to work

ORM builds custom revenue forecast models that turn concepts like burn multiple into prescriptive action for your team.

Schedule a Demo